Skip to main content

Save early to earn more

Save early to earn more Prabhakar Sinha | TNN Time is money, goes the saying, which holds true in almost all aspects of life. But, it is more so in case of savings. If you start saving early, by the time you retire, you will have enough money to lead a prosperous retired life. When you start saving early, your saved amount gets a longer time to earn returns. Take for example, if you start saving at the age of 25, or just at the time when you get your first salary, your savings of Rs 5,000 per month, at a conservative return of 10% per annum, will swell to Rs 1.91 crore in 35 years or by the time you retire at the age of 60. But, if you start saving late, say, at the age of 30, your saving of Rs 5,000 per month will become Rs 1.14 crore. If you start at 35, the amount will become only Rs 67 lakh. And, at the age of 35, even if you start saving double the amount i.e. Rs 10,000 per month, by the time of retirement, that will become only Rs 1.34 crore. This is called power of compounding. At the rate of 10%, a savings of Rs 5,000 per month becomes Rs 3,90,412 after 5 years. This means, by then your saved amount will earn around Rs 39,000 per annum, which is around 65% of the amount that you are saving. In 10 years, your saving will swell to Rs 10,32,760, whose earnings itself will be more than 1.7 times of your monthly savings. That means, by the age of 35, your savings will earn more than your monthly savings. After 25 years, your savings become Rs 67 lakh and contribute Rs 6.70 lakh in your net saved amount every year thereafter, which is more than 11 times of your savings. So, if you will give more time to grow your money, more you will benefit.
http://www.epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIA/2009/06/10&PageLabel=16&EntityId=Ar01605&ViewMode=HTML&GZ=T

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Dogs Life - Aftermath of the Mumbai Attack

We all were disturbed by the pictures running for over 60 Hours on the news Channel. The news was the Attack on the Financial Capital of India. The number of Terrorist said to be between 1-12 as per the government statement. The number of People Dead 195 approx in which 22 Foreigners died and around 325 people injured. But most important aspect is i felt that we all Stupid Common Men of India are living DOGS LIFE. Know why? ... It is because the 16 Soilders who died protecting us are given title of the 'Shaheed' which they deserve. The fidayeens who came here to attack Mumbai would be called Shaheed by Jehadis - (i dont feel that they are shaheed) but since terrorism is an undeclared war .. some respect for the opponents too. But what about the STUPID COMMON MAN who died in this encounter.. they are not Shaheeds -- neither they will be remembered for giving up their lives. they will be forgotten by the passage of time and then one more such incident will happen and the list wil...

Terror Strikes AHMD

26.07.2008 Terror strikes Ahmedabad... Rather Terrorist Stike Ahmedabad. Serial Blasts took place in Ahmedabad and these 17 Blasts in all killed more than 45 people and left hundreds lamenting with injury and loss of their loved ones. But the spirit of Ahmedabad ensured that we are not terrorised with these attempts and we are not letting the TERROR HIT AHMEDABAD. terrorist may hit any place but if people are not terrorised their purpose is not solved. Every thing was back on track today and every person was in routine. those who have lost their loved ones will take some time. This was an act of Cowardice and the people of Ahmedabad are stronger than any other place. REMEMBER that this city was built by Ahmedshah because he saw a Rabbit going agressive on a Dog.. "Jab Kutte pe Sassa aaya Tab badshah ne sheher basaya" If any city in the world can face these cowards it is ahmedabad. so it is the terrorist who have struck ahmedabad and not the Terror. and the people here are st...

India a Dictatorial Democracy?

I was going through an article on Democracy and its functioning, and there i found a claim that - "India is largest Democracy" of world in terms of the Population. I thought of comparing the same with USA which is oldest Democracy of the World. Many people are surprised that how Democracy can function in India in wake of the poverty, illiteracy, Caste, region and religious Divide... so is this democracy functioning "RAM BHAROSE"? Then i thought that is this democracy really democratic? or it is just that the tiger is running in the veil of a cow? I tried to study it from the angle of the kind of political parties and found that the Killer of Democracy in India Lies there. The system or the constitutions of the Political parties have the key dictator in them. The Constitution of India becomes helpless against the Party constitutions in indian Democracy. In the USA there are 2 political parties and thus the people with political aspirations have to choose the...