Skip to main content

India a Dictatorial Democracy?

I was going through an article on Democracy and its functioning, and there i found a claim that - "India is largest Democracy" of world in terms of the Population. I thought of comparing the same with USA which is oldest Democracy of the World.

Many people are surprised that how Democracy can function in India in wake of the poverty, illiteracy, Caste, region and religious Divide... so is this democracy functioning "RAM BHAROSE"?

Then i thought that is this democracy really democratic? or it is just that the tiger is running in the veil of a cow?

I tried to study it from the angle of the kind of political parties and found that the Killer of Democracy in India Lies there. The system or the constitutions of the Political parties have the key dictator in them. The Constitution of India becomes helpless against the Party constitutions in indian Democracy.


In the USA there are 2 political parties and thus the people with political aspirations have to choose the ideology of any one or they can have an independent ideology without a party.

In india there are more number of political parties than the states in india and this is where the trouble lies.

In India the striking feature of the political parties is the WHIP. This is not an animal but a order of the party office bearers that decide in what way the members of the party vote on important issues.

This dictator called WHIP decides the course the party will take in important matters while voting on important issues in the Parliament or state legislature, irrespective of the personal thinking or ideology.

In USA we saw that while the nuclear deal was voted in the house of representatives or the senate it was both the democrats and the republicans who voted against and in favour. it was the personal decision and was not guided by the WHIP.

Democracy according to me means that it should be guided by personal choice and not a DICTATION. when some one dictates what you have to do, will it mean that you have DEMOCRATIC rights?

NO.. so i believe that India is not a democracy with this WHIP having importance in the party constitution and therefore we need to restudy the effect of the WHIP in the party constitutions to see that how can we make india democratic in real sense.

COMMENTS Awaited

(I didnot carry out any actual study so may be factually incorrect on some issues so would like that the readers comment on the blog make the subject more clear on the issue)

Comments

PANKTI JOG said…
i agree with u. In fact arvind in his recent address in mumbai, exactly analysed what u have mentioned. our representative does nt ahve any power to represent us and our views in parliament. and our administrative heads are accountable to their chilef and not to public. thus this is not real democracy. It should be direct democracy instead! - Pankti

Popular posts from this blog

Education: A Key Driver of Social Change and Economic Development

Education is not just a means to acquire knowledge and skills, but a powerful tool that can transform individuals, communities, and societies. It can contribute to economic growth, social cohesion, and democratic governance. Education is a fundamental human right and a public good that should be accessible to all, regardless of their background or circumstances. However, despite its importance, education remains a contested and politicized issue in many parts of the world. Governments, civil society, the private sector, and other stakeholders have different views and interests in shaping education policies and practices. This has led to unequal access to education, poor quality of education, and inadequate resources for education. To address these challenges, public policymakers and politicians need to understand the importance of education in shaping the society they want to create and serve. They need to recognize that education is not a neutral or technical matter, but a complex...

Save early to earn more

Save early to earn more Prabhakar Sinha | TNN Time is money, goes the saying, which holds true in almost all aspects of life. But, it is more so in case of savings. If you start saving early, by the time you retire, you will have enough money to lead a prosperous retired life. When you start saving early, your saved amount gets a longer time to earn returns. Take for example, if you start saving at the age of 25, or just at the time when you get your first salary, your savings of Rs 5,000 per month, at a conservative return of 10% per annum, will swell to Rs 1.91 crore in 35 years or by the time you retire at the age of 60. But, if you start saving late, say, at the age of 30, your saving of Rs 5,000 per month will become Rs 1.14 crore. If you start at 35, the amount will become only Rs 67 lakh. And, at the age of 35, even if you start saving double the amount i.e. Rs 10,000 per month, by the time of retirement, that will become only Rs 1.34 crore. This is called power...

Meet with Saurabhee Winner of - INDIAN IDOL 4

Saurabhee.. Nirali.. Pratik.. ME(Punit) and Hardik 21/10/2009 11:00 PM Outside Ahmedabad Management Association... We Friends met at our hang out and got a chance to meet Saurabhee winner of Indian Idol 4. To a sweet surprise we got the chance to meet her because of my Friend Viraj's sister Nirali who was also participant of Indian Idol. We Group of Lawyer friends were impressed by her poise and humility. We literally Interviewed her and also asked her regarding her experience post winning Indian Idol. We also asked her about how she will compare her life before and after the Indian Idol 4. She was kind enough to answer our curious Quick Fires and also made us understand the issues attached to the stardom and we found her too humble and down to earth that she mixed up with us in a very short time and we didn’t feel like talking to some star. We also discussed some daily soaps running on TV Channels and the realities attached to reality shows. Impressed is what I will say after mee...